Research with the both high level of reliability and validity has the high

Introduction

• Definition
• Reliability, Validity and objectives
• Impact (Multi dimensional of lacking these qualities) → Points from Potential error

WHAT IS THE DEBATE OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

• This issue(reliability and validity)arise due to following reasons

• Areas where subjectivity comes in→

• How value ( social researcher and subject) come into picture

• Potential error in casual explanation (These makes the Sociology less scientific or away from nature science) (Why the issue of subjectivity render it less reliable and valid; Loss it's tag of objectivity; Not able to establish that Objective reality exist in Social world)

←[][[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[]→

• Way out( Reliability & validity)
• Mats Alvesson → Reflexive Pragmatism (Alternative of Objective picture of reality)
• Ways to achieve objectivity→ (Value neutrality→confluence of qualitative & Quantitative)

Similarity of Approach ( Make it More meaningful)

Conclusion

• Telegram random sampling and Reliability and Validity